For European companies running AI in credit, hiring, healthcare, identity or critical infrastructure: the 2 August 2026 duties are already in force and Annex III conformity binds on 2 December 2027. We deliver the full Conformity Assessment package, every document the regulator demands, signed and ready to defend, without slowing your roadmap.
How the Diagnostic works. Automated. You answer a short intake about your AI systems and we produce a full readiness report: every system classified by risk, every EU AI Act rule that applies listed with its deadline, every gap counted, and the top 3-5 actions ranked by priority. If you continue with us, the Diagnostic price is credited in full toward any next step. If you don't, you keep the report.
The European Union passed a law called the EU AI Act. Since 2 August 2026 the prohibitions, the Article 50 transparency duties, the general-purpose AI model obligations and the regulators' enforcement powers have all been binding, and the Commission's own AI Act service desk confirms those dates. If your company uses AI to make decisions about credit, hiring, healthcare, identity, education or critical infrastructure, your systems are Annex III high-risk and their conformity obligations bind on 2 December 2027. That is 16 months to produce evidence that takes most teams the better part of a year, on systems already in production today. The penalty for failing high-risk obligations reaches €15 million or 3% of global annual revenue, whichever is higher, and for SMEs and start-ups whichever is lower (Article 99).
Note: obligations for Annex III high-risk AI systems were extended to 2 December 2027 by the EU Digital Omnibus Act. The 2 August 2026 date governs prohibitions, transparency (Art. 50), GPAI rules, enforcement powers, and the Art. 49 registration database, all of which apply from that date.
Proving it means producing a specific set of documents the European Commission has named: a risk management procedure, a data governance file, a human oversight design, a technical specification, and a quality management plan. Then signing a declaration that the documents are accurate. Most companies in scope have produced none of them.
The law applies to your company even if it is not based in Europe. If your customers are in the EU, or your AI affects EU users, or your output is used in the EU, you are in scope. The law spells this out in Article 2.
Deloitte Legal surveyed 500 people responsible for AI in their companies in September 2024. 48.6% had not engaged seriously with implementing the EU AI Act, and only 26.2% had actively begun. Source: Deloitte Legal, AI Act Survey 2024.
Every date above is a date to prepare for. Article 4 is not. The AI literacy duty has bound both providers and deployers since 2 February 2025, and on 24 July 2026 Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, the Digital Omnibus, replaced its wording with a version that applies from 27 July 2026. The Omnibus moved the Annex III high-risk conformity deadline to December 2027. It did not move this one.
Here is the whole duty, in the words the law now uses. Providers and deployers "shall take measures to support the development of AI literacy of their staff and other persons dealing with the operation and use of AI systems on their behalf", and the same article adds that this "does not require providers or deployers to guarantee any specific level of AI literacy of any individual".
Two things follow, and both matter more than they look. First, it lands on deployers, which the Act defines as anyone using an AI system under their own authority for professional purposes. That is not the narrow set of companies building high-risk systems. If your team has been using AI assistants for the past 18 months, that is you. Second, it is a duty to take measures, not to certify anybody, so it is genuinely finishable. There is no prescribed course and no certificate.
We will be straight with you about the stick, because you will hear otherwise: Article 4 is not named in Article 99, so no administrative fine attaches to it on its own. The reason to close it is not a fine. It is that a regulator asking about anything else on this page will ask what measures you took, and "none, we were waiting for December 2027" is an answer given by a company that was told and did nothing.
A documented set of measures, an inventory of the AI systems your staff already use, and a training plan. Credited in full against the €1,000 Diagnostic, so it costs nothing to start here and continue.
Slide your annual revenue. Compare what non-compliance could cost you against what 6 weeks with us costs.
If those numbers make sense, find your exact exposure in one week with the Diagnostic →
Compliance software gives you a dashboard. Big 4 Consulting gives you an associate-led retainer. We sit deliberately in the gap.
A dashboard that tracks which controls your team has and has not built. Useful for ongoing monitoring. But it does not write your technical file, your risk assessment, or your oversight design. You still have to find a human to do that work.
We produce every document the law requires, plus a full AI governance framework, vendor questionnaire, registration support, a 12-month roadmap, one 90-minute call with Adrien, and 30 days of email Q&A. Prior diagnostic fee credited in full.
A team of associates billed by the hour, scoped twice before you see an invoice, three to six months to complete. Built for Fortune 500 budgets. Overkill for most companies and far slower than the deadline allows.
Start here if you are not sure whether the law applies to you, or which of your AI systems it applies to.
Fee credited in full against every later step
If you continue to any next step, the €1,000 Diagnostic fee is credited in full. At the Done-For-You tier, it's effectively free.
Book the DiagnosticIf you know the law applies and you want everything handled, documentation, governance, registration, roadmap, and direct access to Adrien.
50% on signature · 50% at the week-three milestone, after you've reviewed the inventory, classification, and first documentation drafts. Full refund if scoping reveals the work is out of scope.
Start Done-For-You · €25,000Multiple AI systems, multiple jurisdictions, or board-level briefings required.
Quote returned within 2 business days of the scoping call.
Request a scoping callThe Done-For-You engagement bundles six core deliverables and three included extras, plus a full AI governance framework, vendor questionnaire, registration support, a 12-month roadmap, one 90-minute call with Adrien, and 30 days of email Q&A. Big 4 firms charge for each one separately, on hourly retainers, with associate teams that re-scope twice before you see a final invoice.
How we built that total, so you can check it or disagree with it. Every line above carries a price we set ourselves, and the total is their sum. Big 4 firms do not publish a rate for EU AI Act conformity work, so there is no public list price to quote against and we do not pretend to have seen one. They do publish day rates for consultancy on public procurement frameworks, for example the Deloitte LLP G-Cloud 14 rate card published by the UK government, which is where anyone can see the shape of that market for themselves. Treat our total as a stated assumption, not a finding.
Conformity Watch, optional ongoing retainer. The AI Act keeps moving. Harmonised standards finalise through 2026 and 2027. New AI Office guidance lands every quarter. Member states pass implementing acts. Conformity Watch keeps your documentation in lockstep: monthly regulatory-update digests, quarterly documentation reviews and updates, customer and auditor questionnaire-response support, and priority founder access. Pricing scales with your number of high-risk systems. We discuss it on the discovery call, no pressure to take it, no penalty if you don't.
We map every AI system in your company against the law's risk categories.
We document the risks each high-risk system creates and the controls that mitigate them.
We design where humans intervene in your AI, and audit the data you trained it on.
We produce the multi-section technical specification your auditor or customer reads.
We document how you build, test, deploy, and update AI systems on an ongoing basis.
Signed declaration, submission package, sign-off meeting with your team.
Each week ends with a 30-minute review call and a signed deliverable. Adrien Harrison, our founder and CEO, personally reviews and approves every document before it leaves our hands. No associates. No handoffs.
We offer the strongest guarantee on the EU AI Act compliance market. Three commitments, in writing, backed by a money-back clause in the engagement contract.
If we don't deliver every document on the engagement spec sheet by week six, you get a full refund of the second 50% payment. No arguments.
If your auditor, notified body, or enterprise customer rejects our documentation in the first twelve months for AI Act compliance reasons, we revise it at no extra cost until accepted.
If our discovery call reveals the engagement is out of scope for what we deliver, for example, you're a deployer not a provider, we refund your deposit, no questions asked.
Founder & CEO · Better Societies
Forbes-featured serial entrepreneur working in AI safety strategy, based in New York City.
Specialised in AI safety, deep-tech regulation, and responsible-innovation governance. Has worked with founders, investors, researchers, and policymakers from 50+ countries since 2015.
Every Better Societies engagement is led by Adrien personally. Documentation is reviewed and signed by him before delivery. There are no associates, no handoffs, no name partners who appear only in the contract.
Adrien on LinkedIn →Real client engagements are confidential under NDA. The three case studies below walk through what happens when companies matching three common profiles engage Better Societies, with the actual savings calculated against named alternatives.
Their alternatives: a €380,000 PwC quote over four months, or a Vanta dashboard that doesn't write the technical file. Better Societies delivers the same work for €25,000 Done-For-You, including the governance framework, vendor questionnaire, and a 12-month roadmap, leaving engineering free to keep shipping product.
Read the full case study → HR-tech · Pre-Series AA DAX-listed customer requires AI Act documentation in their procurement form. Series A diligence is asking the same questions. Six weeks of Better Societies work delivers the technical file plus an investor-ready compliance summary, closing both at once.
Read the full case study → Partnership · Law firmTheir clients keep asking about the AI Act. Hiring a compliance engineer costs €130,000 per year. Referring to Better Societies pays €5,100 per client across the engagement and the retainer, with twelve hours of partner time per referral.
Read the full case study →Tell us what you have so we can tell you what you need. We follow up personally within one business day.
Based on your answers, the Readiness Diagnostic is built for you. Secure your slot now, or book a free call first. Either way we follow up personally within one business day.
Your compliance path
Each step credits toward the next. The Diagnostic is the intended starting point, and it is the step we scope everything else from.
Diagnostic if you know you need the work. Discovery call if you want to talk it through first.
Questions? Email info@bettersocieties.world